New name. Same WCUI legacy.
WCUI is now Smith Chason College.

faculty teaching students in classroom behind podium

Academic Policies

Discover our policies crafted to uphold Smith Chason excellence.

Explore the academic policies at Smith Chason College, designed to ensure academic excellence, maintain integrity, and provide support on your educational journey.

Find out why Smith Chason is an institution of excellence.

At Smith Chason College, we are dedicated to establishing a framework that empowers students, allowing them to live up to their potential in their pursuit of knowledge and professional development.

Smith Chason College is committed to maintaining the highest standards of academic integrity. Academic integrity is expected in all forms of academic work and course-related activities, including but not limited to written assignments, examinations, quizzes, discussion posts, laboratory work, clinical and externship activities, attendance records, and the use of technology or external assistance.

Students are required to submit work that reflects their own original ideas and efforts. When incorporating the words, ideas, or materials of others, students must provide appropriate citations both within the text and in a reference list, in accordance with established academic standards. Students must also clearly indicate the extent to which outside sources have contributed to their work.

Materials requiring citation include, but are not limited to, printed and electronic publications (whether copyrighted or not), as well as verbal, visual, or digital content that originates from an identifiable source.

Academic misconduct may occur in a variety of contexts and is not limited to traditional forms such as plagiarism or cheating on examinations. All students are expected to demonstrate honesty, integrity, and ethical behavior in all academic activities.

Violations of this policy—including, but not limited to, cheating, plagiarism, falsification of information, or unauthorized use of resources will result in disciplinary action and application of sanctions. Such action and sanctions may include a warning with remediation; failing grade on the applicable assignment quiz or exam; course failure; probation; suspension; or termination from the College.

Violations of Academic Integrity

A violation of academic integrity is considered academic misconduct. Academic misconduct includes, but not limited to, the following:

  • Using third-parties (e.g. tutor, friend, classmate, reviewer entity, and text-generating AI sources) to complete or make extensive revisions to assignments or test/exams or any other academic work
  • Using or attempting to use words, ideas, materials, or work without properly acknowledging, documenting, and citing the source
  • Copying work submitted by another student
  • Taking exam answers from another student’s paper or using old exams not approved by the instructor of the course
  • Falsifying sign-in or sign-out times for lab, externship, and clinicals as applicable to the program
  • Operating any type of audio or video recording device in a classroom, laboratory, or clinical setting without prior expressed permission from the Campus Director or Director of Education
  • Utilizing unapproved materials to answer exam questions

Utilizing artificial intelligence (“AI”) or unauthorized technology to:

    • Generate exam, test, or quiz responses
    • Automate entire assignment submissions;
    • Directly respond to discussion questions and claim response as your own voice; and
    • Provide real-time suggestions or re-write answers during an exam, test, or quiz

For more information regarding violations of academic integrity specific to AI, see Student Guidelines for Acceptable Use of Artificial Intelligence.

The most common form of academic misconduct is taking someone else’s work or ideas and presenting them as one’s own and is referred to as “plagiarism”.

Student Guidance

To avoid plagiarism, students must cite their sources and give credit where credit is due. Students can refer to the APA Citation information (links to an external site) in the Smith Library for samples, templates, and guidance for how to properly cite resources.

Students are expected to produce work that displays proper use of the most up-to-date version of APA. This includes, but is not limited to, the use of in-text citations, quotation marks, and references to ensure proper acknowledgment is given to any external source(s) used in the creation of academic material.

Students are expected to submit original work and properly acknowledge external sources used in the creation of academic material. For additional information and support, students are encouraged to review and complete the Smith Chason College – Learning Resource Center Tutorial, Plagiarism: What is it and How to Avoid it.

Policy Violation, Process, and Sanctions

Any alleged violation of the College’s Academic Integrity Policy, including plagiarism, will be investigated to determine whether it constitutes a reportable offense.

Students found in violation of the Academic Integrity Policy are subject to disciplinary action, up to and including termination from the College. Sanctions will be determined by the College based on the severity and scope of the violation. Multiple sanctions may be applied as appropriate.

 

Sanctions:

Warning, Academic Integrity Acknowledgment, Remediation, and Failing Grade

Following an investigation, a first academic integrity violation may result in a formal warning. If placed on warning, the student will be required to sign an Academic Integrity Acknowledgment form, confirming understanding of the College’s policy and acknowledging that any future violations will result in termination from the College.

The violation and warning status will be documented in the student’s academic record. The student may also be required to complete remediation, which may include working with the College librarian to review APA standards and citation practices. Remediation may be provided as determined by the College. The purpose of remediation is to allow the student an opportunity to develop knowledge, skills, and behaviors to support academic success. Remediation may be assigned based on the nature and severity of the violation, including but not limited to writing or citation training, writing and submitting a reflection essay, connecting with additional resources to improve academic conduct, and/or meetings with advisors or academic leadership.

As part of warning and at the College’s discretion, the student may receive a failing grade for the assignment, examination, or course, associated with the integrity violation, depending on the circumstances. The student will not be permitted to resubmit the affected work. If a failing grade is issued for a course, the student will be required to repeat the course.

 

Probation or Probation with Suspension

Following an investigation, a first violation may result in escalation to probation or probation with suspension, depending on the scope, nature, and severity of the violation and its impact on the student’s academic work.

The duration and conditions of probation and/or probation with suspension will be determined by the College. The purpose of suspension is to provide the student with an opportunity to reflect, develop accountability, and demonstrate ethical and behavioral improvement before returning to the academic environment.

The student may be required to complete additional requirements as determined by the College during the suspension period and prior to reinstatement.

Refer to the definition of Probation and Suspension within the College Catalog for more information regarding these sanctions.

 

Termination

Following an investigation, a first violation of the Academic Integrity Policy may result in immediate termination from the College, depending on the severity of the offense. In all cases, however, a second violation of the Academic Integrity Policy will result in termination from the College.

Documentation of the termination decision, including all supporting materials, will be maintained in the student’s academic record.

Smith Chason College recognizes that Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools can be valuable resources to support student learning, research, writing, and preparation for the workplace. When used appropriately, AI may help students brainstorm ideas, improve understanding, organize thoughts, review writing, or explore academic topics. However, AI should support learning, not replace a student’s original thought, academic effort, judgment, or demonstration of required skills.

Students who use AI tools are expected to do so safely, responsibly, ethically, and in accordance with college requirements. All academic work must represent the student’s own understanding, voice, and effort unless the use of outside assistance, including AI assistance, is permitted and properly acknowledged. Students remain responsible for the accuracy, quality, originality, and appropriateness of any work they submit.

Academic Integrity

AI is a tool to support learning, not a substitute for learning. Students who use AI in a way that misrepresents authorship, bypasses academic requirements, violates course instructions, or results in submission of work that is not their own will be subject to disciplinary action, up to and including termination from the College.

Appropriate Use of AI

AI may be used when expressly permitted in writing permitted by the instructor, course, assignment instructions, or College guidance. Depending on the course and nature of the academic work, appropriate uses may include support for brainstorming, outlining, studying, research planning, grammar review, drafting practice, or improving clarity, provided the student remains responsible for the final work submitted. The College requires students who use AI tools to do so in ways that protect student and College information.

Students are encouraged to openly discuss appropriate AI use with instructors when students are unsure whether a particular use of AI is permitted and get expressly written approval.

Approved Tools and Protection of Information

Students must only use AI technologies and platforms that have been reviewed and expressly authorized in writing by the College when College systems, student information, or other protected information may be involved. Built-in AI features within College-licensed systems are considered approved unless otherwise noted provided the use case has been expressly permitted .

Students must not enter student records, confidential College information, clinical/externship site information, financial information, personal information, or other protected data into AI tools.

Prohibited or Unauthorized Use

Unauthorized use of AI to complete academic work may be treated as a violation of the College’s academic integrity policy. This includes, but is not limited to, using AI to:

  • Generate exam, test, or quiz responses;
  • Complete an entire assignment on behalf of the student;
  • Directly respond to discussion questions and claim the response as the student’s own voice;
  • Replace required student analysis, reflection, clinical judgment, calculation, writing, or other demonstrated competency;
  • Assist with scanning competencies and/or clinical competencies;
  • Avoid citation, disclosure, or other academic requirements.

Where a course, assignment, or instructor does not clearly permit AI use, students must ask for written guidance before using AI in connection with academic work.

Instructor and Course-Level Expectations

Instructors may allow, limit, or prohibit AI use depending on the course, assignment, program requirements, clinical or lab expectations, accreditation standards, or learning objectives.

Students are expected to demonstrate professional behavior at all times while participating in program activities, whether on campus or in an online learning environment. Professionalism is a fundamental expectation and includes maintaining an appropriate appearance, demonstrating respectful and courteous conduct, and contributing positively to the learning environment.

Students are required to adhere to the College and program specific dress codes and to interact with classmates, instructors, staff, and guests in a professional and respectful manner. Professional behavior includes arriving prepared for class, communicating appropriately, engaging respectfully in discussions, and maintaining a learning environment free from distractions or disruptions.

Instructors are responsible for monitoring and addressing professional conduct concerns. When unprofessional behavior occurs, an instructor may issue either a verbal or written warning to provide the student with an opportunity to correct the behavior. However, if the behavior continues after a warning, or if the conduct is deemed sufficiently disruptive or inappropriate, additional disciplinary action will be taken in accordance with program and College policies.

Examples of unprofessional behavior include, but are not limited to:

  • Failure to comply with the established dress code.
  • Making disrespectful, offensive, or disparaging remarks about fellow students, instructors, staff, patients, or others.
  • Creating excessive noise or engaging in disruptive behavior that interferes with teaching or learning.
  • Using inappropriate language, gestures, or communication methods.
  • Displaying a lack of respect for classroom rules, institutional policies, or professional standards.
  • Engaging in behaviors that negatively impact the learning environment, whether in person or online.

Students are expected to conduct themselves in a manner that reflects the standards and expectations of their chosen profession. Consistent professionalism helps foster a respectful, safe, and productive educational environment for everyone.

Smith Chason College utilizes the TurnitIn® Originality Verification Tool to assist students in ensuring the work they are submitting is their own. Students are encouraged to utilize the tool prior to submitting their work for grading.

While the TurnitIn® Tool does not detect plagiarism, it does assist in the verification of the overall integrity of the work being presented by the student. Students can review the information provided in the Turnitin report and revise their assignments before the official submission.

Faculty members thoroughly review each student assignment regardless of the score provided by TurnitIn® to determine the most appropriate action. Exclusive use of the TurnitIn® similarity score % as criteria for identifying possible violations of academic integrity is prohibited. All student work must be assessed based on the content and contextual use of sources.